Send article

Algocracy in the Global South: The threat of a new dependency

Authors

Vol. 14 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-2584.2025.74784
Download

Abstract

The widespread use of Artificial Intelligence systems in public functions is known as algocracy. However, there is limited research on its implications in the Global South. Considering the concentration of capabilities in developed countries, we state that algocracy raises significant social, political, and geopolitical implications. It has the potential to incorporate the biases and values of the service vendors, reduce sovereignty, and facilitate political manipulation. Furthermore, it could be used as a tool for dominant countries to exert power beyond their borders. Therefore, this paper analyzes the implications of algocracy, as it could lead to the imposition of dependency relations on developed countries in the Global South.

Keywords:

Algocracy , Global South , Algorithm , Dependency , Artificial Intelligence

Author Biographies

Nicolas De la Peña, Universidad de La Salle, Facultad de Economía, Empresa y Desarrollo Sostenible

Nicolás De la Peña. B.A. in International Trade and M.A. in International Affairs. Teaches International Relations. His research focuses on the intersection of international business, global affairs, and emerging technologies, thus exploring new interactions between global actors. Full-time professor at the Faculty of Economics, Enterprise and Sustainable Development (Universidad de La Salle – Bogotá, Colombia).

Hugo Fernando Guerrero Sierra, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada

Hugo Fernando Guerrero Sierra holds a Bachelor’s degree in Law and a Ph.D. in International Relations and Globalization at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain. He is also a postdoctoral researcher at the Faculty of Law of the University of Salamanca, Spain. He teaches International Relations and Political Science at Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Colombia. His research focuses on comparative politics and international relations. This article results from his academic practice as a full-time professor at the Faculty of International Relations, Strategy and Security of Universidad Militar Nueva Granada

Iván Ramón Rodríguez Benavidez, Universidad de La Salle, Escuela de Humanidades y Estudios Sociales

Iván Ramón Rodríguez Benavidez. B.A. in Philosophy. Ph.D. in Contemporary Philosophy and Classical Studies. Teaches political philosophy. His research focuses on imperfect types of democracy, injustice, and governance. Full-time professor at the School of Humanities and Social Studies (Universidad de La Salle - Bogotá, Colombia).

References

Ahn, Michael J. and Yu-Che Chen (2020). “Artificial intelligence in government: Potentials, challenges, and the future”. The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 243-252. DOI: 10.1145/3396956.3398260.

Ananny, Mike (2016). “Toward an ethics of algorithms: Convening, observation, probability, and timeliness”. Science, Technology & Human Values, 41 (1): 93-117. DOI: 10.1177/0162243915606523.

Ansari, Shagufta Parveen M. A., Joseph Oduor Odongo, M. Z. M. Nomani, Ghazal Salahuddin, Mohammed Faez Hasan, and Laxmi Kirana Pallathadka (2022). “Evaluating the role of environment management system based on artificial intelligence”. Materials Today: Proceedings, 56: 2240-2244. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.571.

Aoki, Naomi (2020). “An experimental study of public trust in AI chatbots in the public sector”. Government Information Quarterly, 37 (4): 1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101490.

Ashforth, Blake E and Barrie W. Gibbs (1990). “The double-edge of organizational legitimation”. Organization Science, 1 (2): 177-194. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1.2.177.

Azuaje Pirela, Michelle (2023). “Propiedad intelectual como herramienta para promover la transparencia y prevenir la discriminación algorítmica”. Revista Chilena de Derecho y Tecnología, 12: 1-34. DOI: 10.5354/0719-2584.2023.70131.

Bao, Yang, Gilles Hilary, and Bin Ke (2022). “Artificial intelligence and fraud detection”. In Volodymyr Babich, John R. Birge, and Gilles Hilary (editors), Innovative Technology at the Interface of Finance and Operations: Volume I (223-247). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-75729-8_8.

Beaumier, Guillaume and Madison Cartwright (2024). “Cross-network weaponization in the semiconductor supply chain”. International Studies Quarterly, 68 (1): 1-18. DOI: 10.1093/isq/sqae003.

Beckman, Ludvig, Jonas Hultin Rosenberg, and Karim Jebari (2022). “Artificial intelligence and democratic legitimacy: The problem of publicity in public authority”. AI & Society, 39: 975-984. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-022-01493-0.

Belli, Luca (2021). “Cybersecurity policymaking in the BRICS countries: From addressing national priorities to seeking international cooperation”. The African Journal of Information and Communication, 28: 1-14. DOI: 10.23962/10539/32208.

Beraja, Martin, Andrew Kao, David Y. Yang, and Noam Yuchtman (2023). “AI-tocracy”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 138 (3): 1349-1402. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjad012.

Besley, Timothy and Torsten Persson (2019). “Democratic values and institutions”. American Economic Review: Insights, 1 (1): 59-76. DOI: 10.1257/aeri.20180248.

Bøggild, Troels (2020). “Politicians as party hacks: Party loyalty and public distrust in politicians”. The Journal of Politics, 82 (4): 1516-1529. DOI: 10.1086/708681.

Brkan, Maja (2019). “Artificial intelligence and democracy: The impact of disinformation, social bots and political targeting”. Delphi - Interdisciplinary Review of Emerging Technologies, 2 (2): 66-71. DOI: 10.21552/delphi/2019/2/4.

Brooks, Stephen G (2005). Producing security: Multinational corporations, globalization, and the changing calculus of conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Buchanan, Ben and Andrew Imbrie (2024). The new fire: War, peace, and democracy in the age of AI. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Cai, Kevin G (2018). “The one belt one road and the Asian infrastructure investment bank: Beijing’s new strategy of geoeconomics and geopolitics”. Journal of Contemporary China, 27 (114): 831-847. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2018.1488101.

Cartwright, Madison (2020). “Internationalising state power through the Internet: Google, Huawei and geopolitical struggle”. Internet Policy Review, 9 (3): 1-18. DOI: 10.14763/2020.3.1494.

Centeno, Miguel Angel (1993). “The new leviathan: The dynamics and limits of technocracy”. Theory and Society, 22 (3): 307-335.

Cha, Victor D (2023). “Collective resilience: Deterring China’s weaponization of economic interdependence”. International Security, 48 (1): 91-124.

Chomanski, Bartek (2022). “Legitimacy and automated decisions: The moral limits of algocracy”. Ethics and Information Technology, 24 (3): 1-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10676-022-09647-w.

Clausius, Madison (2022). “The banning of TikTok, and the ban of foreign software for national security purposes”. Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 21 (2): 273-292. Available at https://tipg.link/lJpn.

Coddou, Alberto and Sebastián Smart (2021). “La transparencia y la no discriminación en el Estado de bienestar digital”. Revista Chilena de Derecho y Tecnología, 10 (2): 301-332. DOI: 10.5354/0719-2584.2021.61034.

Coeckelbergh, Mark (2022). “Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence”. AI and Ethics, 3 (4): 1341-1350. DOI: 10.1007/s43681-022-00239-4.

Crawford, Kate (2022). Atlas of AI. Connecticut: Yale University Press.

Dados, Nour and Raewyn Connell (2012). “The global south”. Contexts, 11 (1): 12-13.

Danaher, John (2016). “The threat of algocracy: Reality, resistance and accommodation”. Philosophy & Technology, 29 (3): 245-268. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-015-0211-1.

—. (2020). Freedom in an age of algocracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

De Carvalho, Gabriela, Achim Schmid, and Johanna Fischer (2021). “Classifications of health care systems: Do existing typologies reflect the particularities of the Global South?”. Global Social Policy, 21 (2): 278-300.

Drezner, Daniel W, Henry Farrell, and Abraham Newman (2021). The Uses and Abuses of Weaponized Interdependence. Washington D. C.: Brookings Institution Press.

Dufour, Dany Robert (2009). “Governance versus government”. Cuadernos de Administración, 25 (41): 27-37. DOI: 10.25100/cdea.v25i41.390.

Dwivedi, Yogesh K., Laurie Hughes, Elvira Ismagilova, Gert Aarts, Crispin Coombs, Tom Crick, Yanqing Duan, and others (2021). “Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy”. International Journal of Information Management, 57: 1-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002.

European Parliament (2022). “Resolución del Parlamento Europeo, de 3 de mayo de, 2022, sobre la inteligencia artificial en la era digital (2020/2266(INI))”. Available at https://tipg.link/lJqe.

Farrell, Henry and Abraham L. Newman (2019a). “Weaponized interdependence: how global economic networks shape state coercion”. International Security, 44 (1): 42-79. DOI: 10.1162/isec_a_00351.

—. (2019b). “Chained to globalization”. Foreign Affairs, 99 (1): 70-80.

Farrell, Henry, Abraham Newman, and Jeremy Wallace (2022). “Spirals of delusion”. Foreign Affairs, 101 (5): 161-181.

Floridi, Luciano and Mariarosaria Taddeo (2016). “What is data ethics?” Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 374 (2083): 1-5. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0360.

Floridi, Luciano, Josh Cowls, Monica Beltrametti, Raja Chatila, Patrice Chazerand, Virginia Dignum, Christoph Luetge, Robert Madelin, Ugo Pagallo, Francesca Rossi, Burkhard Schafer, Peggy Valcke, and Effy Vayena (2018). “AI4People-An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations”. Minds and Machines, 28 (4): 689-707. DOI: 10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5.

Franck, Jens-Uwe and Martin Peitz (2023). “Market power of digital platforms”. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 39 (1): 34-46. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grac045.

Fricano, Alessandro (2020). “Algocracy’: The decline of representative democracy”. In Patrizia Feletig, Andrea Loreggia, Andrea Resca, Stefano Quintarelli (editors), Proceedings of the First International Forum on Digital and Democracy. Towards A Sustainable Evolution 2020, Venice, Italy, December 10-11, 2020. Volume 2781 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Available at https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2781/poster1.pdf

Frischmann, Brett and Evan Selinger (2018). Re-engineering humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gabardo, Emerson, Ana Cristina Aguilar, and Olga Lúcia Castreghini de Freitas (2022). “The digital divide in Brazil and the accessibility as a fundamental right”. Revista Chilena de Derecho y Tecnología, 11 (2): 1-26. DOI: 10.5354/0719-2584.2021.60730.

Gillings, Michael R., Martin Hilbert, and Darrell J. Kemp (2016). “Information in the biosphere: Biological and digital worlds”. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31 (3): 180-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.013.

González, Roberto J (2017). “Hacking the citizenry?: Personality profiling, ‘big data’ and the election of Donald Trump”. Anthropology Today, 33 (3): 9-12. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8322.12348.

Gräf, Eike (2017). “When automated profiling threatens our freedom”. European Data Protection Law Review, 3 (4): 441-451. DOI: 10.21552/edpl/2017/4/6.

Granados, Oscar M. and Nicolas De la Peña (2021). “Artificial intelligence and international system structure”. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 64: 1-24. DOI: 10.1590/0034-7329202100103.

Gray, Kevin and Barry K Gills (2016). “South-South cooperation and the rise of the Global South”. Third World Quarterly, 37 (4): 557-574.

Gui, Qinchang, Chengliang Liu, and Debin Du (2019). “Globalization of science and international scientific collaboration: A network perspective”. Geoforum, 105: 1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.06.017.

Guriev, Sergei and Daniel Treisman (2019). “Informational autocrats”. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33 (4): 100-127.

Han, Byung-Chul (2022). Infocracy: Digitization and the Crisis of Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hansen, Jesper Asring and Poul Aaes Nielsen (2022). “How do public managers learn from performance information? Experimental evidence on problem focus, innovative search, and change”. Public Administration Review, 82 (5): 946-957. DOI: 10.1111/puar.13533.

Harari, Yuval Noah (2018). Homo deus: A brief history of tomorrow. New York: HarperCollins.

Hartmann, Philipp and Joachim Henkel (2020). “The rise of corporate science in AI: Data as a strategic resource”. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6 (3): 359-381. DOI: 10.5465/amd.2019.0043.

Hausmann, Ricardo and César A. Hidalgo (2011). “The network structure of economic output”. Journal of Economic Growth, 16 (4): 309-342. DOI: 10.1007/s10887-011-9071-4.

Henman, Paul (2020). “Improving public services using artificial intelligence: Possibilities, pitfalls, governance”. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 42 (4): 209-221. DOI: 10.1080/23276665.2020.1816188.

Hoadley, Daniel S. and Nathan J. Lucas (2018). Artificial Intelligence and National Security. Washington, D. C.: Congressional Research Service. Available at https://tipg.link/lJy1.

Howard, Philip N., Samuel Woolley, and Ryan Calo (2018). “Algorithms, bots, and political communication in the US, 2016 election: The challenge of automated political communication for election law and administration”. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 15 (2): 81-93. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2018.1448735.

Huang, Jingyang and Kellee S. Tsai (2022). “Securing authoritarian capitalism in the digital age: The political economy of surveillance in China”. The China Journal, 88: 2-28. DOI: 10.1086/720144.

Hwang, Tim (2018). “Computational power and the social impact of artificial intelligence”. arXiv [cs.AI], 1-44. Available at https://tipg.link/lJyC.

Innerarity, Daniel (2022). La sociedad del desconocimiento. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg.

Jiang, Fei, Yong Jiang, Hui Zhi, Yi Dong, Hao Li, Sufeng Ma, Yilong Wang, Qiang Dong, Haipeng Shen, and Yongjun Wang (2017). “Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Past, present and future”. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 2 (4): 230-243. DOI: 10.1136/svn-2017-000101.

Jonas, Hans (2014). “Technology and responsibility: Reflections on the new tasks of ethics”. In Ronald L. Sandler (editor), Ethics and emerging technologies (pp. 37-47). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. DOI: 10.1057/9781137349088_3.

Kaplan, Jerry (2016). Artificial intelligence: What everyone needs to know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Khan, Sikandar, Adnan Adnan, and Naveed Iqbal (2022). “Applications of artificial intelligence in transportation”. 2022 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET), 1-6. DOI: 10.1109/ICECET55527.2022.9872928.

Khanna, Parag (2016). Connectography: Mapping the future of global civilization. New York: Random House Publishing Group.

Köchling, Alina and Marius Claus Wehner (2020). “Discriminated by an algorithm: A systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development”. BuR - Business Research, 13 (3): 795-848. DOI: 10.1007/s40685-020-00134-w.

Kroll, Joshua A (2018). “The fallacy of inscrutability”. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 376 (2133): 1-14. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2018.0084.

Kwet, Michael (2019). “Digital colonialism: US empire and the new imperialism in the Global South”. Race & Class, 60 (4): 3-26. DOI: 10.1177/0306396818823172.

Lanier, Jaron (2018). Ten arguments for deleting your social media accounts right now. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

Lee, Kai-Fu (2018). AI superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the new world order. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Lehdonvirta, Vili (2022). Cloud empires: How digital platforms are overtaking the state and how we can regain control. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Lemos, André L. M. (2023). “The future of the platform society in Brazil”. Intercom: Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Comunicação, 46: 1-12. DOI: 10.1590/1809-58442023115en

Machin, Mirialys, Julio A. Sanguesa, Piedad Garrido, and Francisco J. Martinez (2018). “On the use of artificial intelligence techniques in intelligent transportation systems”. 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW), 332-337. DOI: 10.1109/WCNCW.2018.8369029.

Malek, Md Abdul (2022). “Criminal Courts’ artificial intelligence: The way it reinforces bias and discrimination”. AI and Ethics, 2 (1): 233-245. DOI: 10.1007/s43681-022-00137-9.

Martini, Mario (2020). “Regulating algorithms”. In Martin Ebers and Susana Navas (editors), Algorithms and Law (pp. 100-135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108347846.004.

Matheson, Craig (1987). “Weber and the classification of forms of legitimacy”. The British Journal of Sociology, 38 (2): 199-215. DOI: 10.2307/590532.

Maxigas and Niels ten Oever (2023). “Geopolitics in the infrastructural ideology of 5G”. Global Media and China, 8 (3): 271-288. DOI: 10.1177/20594364231193950.

McIntyre, Lee (2018). Post-truth. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Miller, Michael K (2015). “Elections, information, and policy responsiveness in autocratic regimes”. Comparative Political Studies, 48 (6): 691-727. DOI: 10.1177/0010414014555443.

Mohan, Giles and May Tan-Mullins (2019). “The geopolitics of South–South infrastructure development: Chinese-financed energy projects in the Global South”. Urban Studies, 56 (7): 1368-1385.

Mulligan, Casey B., Ricard Gil, and Xavier Sala-i-Martin (2004). “Do democracies have different public policies than nondemocracies?”. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18 (1): 51-74. Available at https://tipg.link/lJzZ.

Muñoz, Catherine (2021). “La discriminación en una sociedad automatizada: Contribuciones desde América Latina”. Revista Chilena de Derecho y Tecnología, 10 (1): 271-307. DOI: 10.5354/0719-2584.2021.58793.

Nhemachena, Artwell (2024). “Coloniality of democracy and algocracy in Africa: Vanhucracy as an afrocentric model for politics”. Journal of Black Studies, 55 (7): 535-553. DOI: 10.1177/00219347241251494.

Nuccio, Massimiliano and Marco Guerzoni (2019). “Big data: Hell or heaven? Digital platforms and market power in the data-driven economy”. Competition & Change, 23 (3): 312-328. DOI: 10.1177/1024529418816525.

O’Neil, Cathy (2017). Armas de destrucción Matemática: Cómo el Big Data aumenta la desigualdad y amenaza la democracia. Madrid: Capitán Swing.

Oakes, Tim (2021). “The belt and road as method: Geopolitics, technopolitics and power through an infrastructure lens”. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 62 (3): 281-285. DOI: 10.1111/apv.12319.

Obermeyer, Ziad, Brian Powers, Christine Vogeli, and Sendhil Mullainathan (2019). “Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations”. Science, 366 (6464): 447-453. DOI: 10.1126/science.aax2342.

OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2024). Selected OECD technology domains: Technologies related to Artificial Intelligence. Stats OECD. Available at https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?pg=0&fc=Topic&fs[0]=Topic%2C1%7CScience%252C%20technology%20and%20innovation%23INT%23%7CIntellectual%20property%23INT_PRP%23&bp=true&snb=8&df[ds]=dsDisseminateFinalDMZ&df[id]=DSD_PATENTS%40DF_PATENTS_OECDSPECIFIC&df[ag]=OECD.STI.PIE&df[vs]=1.0&dq=.A...PRIORITY...INVENTOR..._T&pd=2020%2C2021&to[TIME_PERIOD]=false

Pagallo, Ugo (2018). “Apples, oranges, robots: Four misunderstandings in today’s debate on the legal status of AI systems”. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 376 (2133): 1-16. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2018.0168.

Peña, Paz (2023). Tecnologías para un planeta en llamas. Santiago: Paidós.

Prestes, Elisa (2022). “The digital geopolitics of 5G: Elements to understand the Chinese technological development of the fifth generation of mobile telephony”. GEOUSP, 26: 1-20. DOI: 10.11606/issn.2179-0892.geousp.2022.194823.

Qiu, Jack Linchuan, Peter K. Yu, and Elisa Oreglia (2022). “A new approach to the geopolitics of Chinese internets”. Information, Communication & Society, 25 (16): 2335-2341. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2022.2136856.

Reiser, Marion and Jörg Hebenstreit (2020). “Populism versus technocracy? Populist responses to the technocratic nature of the EU”. Politics and Governance, 8: 568-579. DOI: 10.17645/pag.v8i4.3361.

Rich, Elaine (1983). Artificial Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Rigby, Michael J (2019). “Ethical dimensions of using artificial intelligence in health care”. AMA Journal of Ethics, 21 (2): 121-124. DOI: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.121.

Romero, José Rafael (2023). “November 2023 stroke highlights”. Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 54 (11): 2713. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.045285.

Rühlig, T. (2023). Chinese influence through technical standardization power. Journal of Contemporary China, 32(139), 54-72. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2022.2052439

Russell, Stuart Jonathan, and Peter Norvig (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. London: Pearson.

Secinaro, Silvana, Davide Calandra, Aurelio Secinaro, Vivek Muthurangu, and Paolo Biancone (2021). “The role of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A structured literature review”. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21 (1): 1-23. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01488-9.

Shomer, Yael, Gert-Jan Put, and Einat Gedalya-Lavy (2016). “Intra-party politics and public opinion: How candidate selection processes affect citizens’ satisfaction with democracy”. Political Behavior, 38 (3): 509-534. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-015-9324-6.

Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2017). The chessboard and the web: Strategies of connection in a networked world. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Smart, Sebastián (2024). Algorithmic discrimination in Latin American welfare states. Cambridge: Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, Harvard Kennedy School.

Sourdin, Tania (2021). Judges, Technology and Artificial Intelligence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781788978262.

Stanford University. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2024. Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. https://aiindex.stanford.edu/report/

Starke, Christopher and Marco Lünich (2020). “Artificial intelligence for political decision-making in the European Union: Effects on citizens’ perceptions of input, throughput, and output legitimacy”. Data & Policy, 2: 1-17. DOI: 10.1017/dap.2020.19.

Suchman, Mark C. (1995). “Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches”. Academy of Management Review. Academy of Management, 20 (3): 571-610. DOI: 10.2307/258788.

Sun, Wenlong, Olfa Nasraoui, and Patrick Shafto (2020). “Evolution and impact of bias in human and machine learning algorithm interaction”. PloS One, 15 (8): 1-39. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235502.

Tagiew, Rustam (2020). “What government by algorithm might look like”. arXiv [cs.CY], 1-12. Available at https://tipg.link/lJ-Q.

Tirole, Jean (2021). “Digital dystopia”. The American Economic Review, 111 (6): 2007-2048. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20201214.

Vadell, Javier, Leonardo Ramos, and Pedro Neves (2014). “The international implications of the Chinese model of development in the Global South: Asian Consensus as a network power”. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 57: 91-107.

Wachter, Sandra, Brent Mittelstadt, and Luciano Floridi (2017). “Transparent, explainable, and accountable AI for robotics”. Science Robotics, 2 (6): 1-2. DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.aan6080.

Wallner, Jennifer (2008). “Legitimacy and public policy: Seeing beyond effectiveness, efficiency, and performance”. Policy Studies Journal: The Journal of the Policy Studies Organization, 36 (3): 421-443. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00275.x.

Waltz, K. N. (2000). Structural realism after the Cold War. International security, 25(1), 5-41.

Webb, Amy (2019). The big nine: How the tech titans and their thinking machines could warp humanity. New York: PublicAffairs.

Wiener, Norbert (1961). Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Wigell, Mikael (2019). “Hybrid interference as a wedge strategy: A theory of external interference in liberal democracy”. International Affairs, 95 (2): 255-275. DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiz018.

Williams, Glyn, Paula Meth, and Katie Willis (2014). Geographies of developing areas: The global south in a changing world. New York: Routledge.

Wohlforth, William C. (1999). “The stability of a unipolar world”. International Security, 24 (1): 5-41.

Wu, Shufang, Jing Wang, and Qingchao Jiang (2012). “The application of artificial intelligence in prison”. In David Jin and Sally Lin (editors), Advances in Future Computer and Control Systems (pp. 331-335). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-29387-0_49.

Zuboff, Shoshana (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. New York: PublicAffairs.

Altmetrics
How to Cite
De la Peña, N., Guerrero Sierra, H. F., & Rodríguez Benavidez, I. R. (2025). Algocracy in the Global South: The threat of a new dependency. Revista Chilena De Derecho Y Tecnología, 14. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-2584.2025.74784
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
 
Revista Chilena de Derecho y Tecnología
Facultad de Derecho
Universidad de Chile
DATOS DE INVESTIGACIÓN
Dirección de Servicios de Información y Bibliotecas (SISIB)